Replicating the data a second service reads removes the shared schema and introduces a lag, and the lag is a product decision rather than a technical detail. Storing…
Two deployables writing the same tables is one service with extra steps. Deciding who owns them is the whole decision, and the intermediate state lasts.
5.0 shipped in October with a log-structured type and consumer groups. A list has no acknowledgement, which is why a crashed consumer loses the message.
The naming decides the coupling. ReserveInventory names a recipient and expects an outcome; OrderPlaced names neither, so a second consumer can be added without touching the publisher. Past…
Publishing directly to a queue name binds the producer to the consumer topology, so adding a second consumer means changing the publisher. A topic exchange puts a routing…
A distributed transaction is not available, so the pattern is: do each step, and if a later one fails, run compensating actions to undo the earlier ones. Compensation…